Urdu Translation and validation of Hogg Eco Anxiety Scale

Authors

  • Fareeha Nayab University of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan
  • Saadia Zia University of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan
  • Maham Imtiaz The Women University, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52131/jer.2025.v6i1.2675

Keywords:

Eco-anxiety , Environmental concerns, Climate Change, Anxiety , Environment behaviours., MAPI

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and validate the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS) into Urdu to measure eco-anxiety among the Pakistani population. The study was conducted in two phases. First, linguistic and conceptual equivalence was ensured through translation and back-translation. Second, the scale was empirically validated through psychometric analysis using a purposive sample of adults from South Punjab. Test-retest reliability, cross-language validation, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed. A total of 40 participants were involved in the pilot study and 320 participants in the main validation. The CFA confirmed a one-factor structure with satisfactory model fit indices (Final Model: X2 = 95.167, df = 59, RMSEA = .038, CFI = .969). The Urdu version demonstrated strong internal consistency (X = .87) and cross-language correlation (r = .936, p < .001), confirming its reliability and validity. The validated Urdu scale enables researchers and clinicians to assess eco-anxiety among Urdu-speaking populations and guides public health interventions targeting climate-induced psychological distress.

Author Biographies

Fareeha Nayab, University of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan

Department of Psychology

Saadia Zia, University of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan

Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology,

Maham Imtiaz, The Women University, Multan, Pakistan

Lecturer, Department of Applied Psychology,

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Nayab, F., Zia, S., & Imtiaz, M. (2025). Urdu Translation and validation of Hogg Eco Anxiety Scale . IRASD Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.52131/jer.2025.v6i1.2675