Exploring Factors to enhance Organizational Dissent: What is Moderating Effect of Psychological Safety?

Authors

  • Saman Naz Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Moeed Ahmad Sandhu Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Sajid Tufail Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i1.2092

Keywords:

Organization Dissent, Psychological Safety, Threat to Personal Identity, Perception of Politics, Pakistan

Abstract

The leading objective of this research article is to examine the existing relation between the threat to personal identity, the perception of politics as well as organisational dissent. This study explored mediating role regarding TPI and the moderating effect of psychological safety as well. The research design used for this purpose is cross-sectional .Questionnaires were used for the collection of data by the researcher. The questionnaire was distributed to among 201 respondents using simple random sampling. The gathered data was examined through SPSS and AMOS. The findings of the study revealed that threat to personal identity and perception of politics had significant effect on organizational dissent. Moreover, mediating role of TPI and moderating role of psychological safety was confirmed as well. This research discuss the implication and limitations of the study in details.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Saman Naz, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Institute of Management Sciences

Moeed Ahmad Sandhu, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.

Associate Professor, Institute of Management Sciences

Muhammad Sajid Tufail, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Institute of Management Sciences

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Naz, S., Sandhu, M. A., & Tufail, M. S. (2024). Exploring Factors to enhance Organizational Dissent: What is Moderating Effect of Psychological Safety?. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i1.2092