The iRASD Journal of Management (iRASD-JOM) employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure the integrity and quality of published research. In this system, both the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review to maintain impartiality.

Key Features of Our Peer Review Process:

Reviewer Selection: Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

Review Guidelines: Reviewers have clear guidelines emphasising constructive feedback, scholarly rigour, and ethical considerations.

Timeliness: We strive for an efficient review process and request timely responses from our reviewers.

Author Feedback: Authors receive comprehensive feedback from reviewers, which facilitates the revision process and enhances the quality of their work.

This policy aligns with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, collaboratively developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).